Co-brand Partnerships

award-5.gif (6517 bytes)

topsite.gif (1668 bytes)

webfifty.gif (6027 bytes)

drop_center.gif (2753 bytes)

wpe1.jpg (2095 bytes)

Email Login
New Users Sign Up!
Sign up for our weekly e-mail newsletter!
Tell Me More!

Enter your e-mail address
search by:

Current Weather
Enter Your City, State, or Zipcode:





Enter Symbol


Enter Symbol:


Enter Symbol:


Enter Symbol:


Enter Symbol


Search For:

Company Name
Ticker Symbol

Exclusive Broker

Enter Ticker




Contributed by Bill Bonner
Publisher of: The Fleet Street Letter



Today:  Building the Modern 'Maginot'

*** Beware, says Krugman...Dollar Ponzi running out of 

*** The nation's millionaires remain undaunted... 
G'head, Litigate! It's your right!...

*** Tax rebates working wonders, already... tech 
employees: from wunderkinder to criminals in two short 
years... fate of the "thundernugget"... and so much 

* * * * * * * * * Advertisement * * * * * * * * * 

The last time my lawyer begged me not to send you a 
message like this one, "Flying V" members made a quick 
37% on a Click Commerce trade... 

But I just can't help myself. You see, I happen to know 
a little something about the legal "manipulation" of 
stocks - and this secret information can be extremely 
profitable for "Flying V" traders. By investing against 
the mainstream, you could've made gains of 35%, 55%, 
44%, 18%, another 37%, 13% and 73%. Find out how this 
system could work for you:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

*** "A gradually rising asset price acts like a natural 
Ponzi scheme," writes Paul Krugman in the NYTimes. "Each 
new wave of investors creates capital gains for the 
previous wave."

*** Krugman is talking about the US dollar. Since '95,
the US has been running the largest current account
deficit in the history of the world - bigger by
percentage than either Korea or Indonesia prior to the 
Asian crisis of 1997... and the dollar hit a 16-year
high on July 5th.

*** Yet, according to the IHT, Treasury Secretary 
O'Neill has said of late he doesn't believe the dollar 
is overvalued, that concerns about the current account 
deficit are based on "trivial and wrong notions"... and 
the GDP is obsolete.

*** "When white-haired execs start rejecting old-
fashioned accounting," says Krugman, "the Ponzi scheme 
is about to run out of suckers."

Eric, what's new in New York?


Eric, back from vacation, refreshed:

- "We may well get a significant second-half recovery," 
writes Barron's Alan Abelson. "It just won't be in the 
second half of this year."

- Still, the "long-awaited" summer appears to be under
way. The Nasdaq has gained about 7% since early last 
week and some of the old favorites - notably, the 
semiconductor stocks - have been particularly stellar 

- Yesterday alone, the Nasdaq gained more than 2%, even 
while the Dow stocks struggled. The Dow, which had 
gained as much as 77 points midday, finished the 
training session down about 13 points.

- Abbey Cohen says "the worst is over," trying to answer 
the question on everyone's lips... have we bounced off 
the bottom? 

- "On average," reports Fleet Street Letter contributor 
John Mauldin, "the S&P 500 has risen 32% from the 
market's bottom before the earnings cycle bottoms out... 
it seems easy enough. Just invest when the blood is 
running in the streets. But the trick is to figure out 
when things are worse. Are we looking for ankle deep... 
or knee deep blood?" 

- Mauldin has his eye on the three key "indicators" he 
believes signal turnaround in the S&P... watch this 
space. "Just because things may look pretty bleak 
today," says Mauldin, "there's no reason they can't look 
worse tomorrow."

- Still, uncertainty in the markets has left the 
nation's millionaires undaunted. According to a recent 
survey by Forrester, more than 90 percent of 
millionaires surveyed said that they would either 
maintain or increase their investments in the stock 

- And anyway, what's to worry about? When investments 
don't pan out as hoped, you can always sue your broker. 

- "Among the basic freedoms granted to all U.S. 
citizens," muses the Red Herring, "are the right to 
express oneself, the right to bear arms, and apparently, 
the right to sue the pants off someone when you lose 
money, even if it was your own fault."

- "Considering that as of June 25th," the article 
continues, "the Nasdaq was down 59.4% since its peak on 
March 10, 2000, class action specialists like law firm 
Milberg, Weiss, Bershad Hynes & Lerach are having no 
problem recruiting plaintiffs." The number of lawsuits 
pending against brokerage firms is growing by the week.

- Yet few investment banks appear outwardly concerned 
about their growing exposures to disgruntled investors. 
Indeed, many investment banks are busy sowing the seeds 
of future lawsuits. Worth magazine reports, "Now a 
growing number of blue-chip investment banks are 
actively marketing derivatives to a retail audience, 
expanding the reach of investment strategy that was once 
the exclusive domain of institutional investors and the 
super-rich. According to a report by Merrill Lynch and 
Cap Gemini Ernst & Young, almost a quarter of 
individuals with portfolios worth $1 million or more 
have dabbled in structured equity products."

- If these derivatives fail to produce the desired 
result, is there any doubt that many of these aggrieved 
millionaires will "dabble" in lawsuits against their 

- Addison, your comments yesterday about the American 
real estate bubble are spot on. After spending two weeks 
in California, it's clear that confidence in real estate 
values remains unshakable... for now.

- Most of my friends admitted to having lost a lot of 
money in the stock market. But each would quickly 
volunteer that the "value" in their home continues to 
appreciate. One doctor I know - whose 2500 square-foot 
home in Marin County is currently worth more than $1 
million - told me with a perfectly straight face, "It's 
nice to know I can take the equity out of my home - any 
time I want - and retire."

- Wasn't it just a little more than a year ago that 
shares of Cisco, Corning and Ariba seemed as good as 
"money in the bank?"


Back to Addison in Paris...

*** A note from explaining Tuesday's rally: 
"U.S. stocks rallied at midday Tuesday, shaking off a 
sluggish start, after data showing a pickup in consumer 
spending suggested that the tax rebate checks now being 
mailed to millions of Americans are lifting retail 

*** "Interesting," says Mark Rostenko, the Sovereign 
Strategist. "The first checks went out last week and 
ALREADY they're impacting last month's consumer data! 
Talk about retroactive gains. Maybe G.W. should try to 
push through some more cuts and give first and second 
quarter GDP a lift too." 

*** Well, looks like it's not just lawsuits, anymore. 
"Laid-off Workers Are Striking Back" reads a headline in 
the IHT. "Many workers have put in endless hours and 
sweat for the promise of hefty stock options that never 
materialized," says psychologist Beverly Smallwood. 

*** One 56 year-old ex-employee left a note saying: "I 
have been loyal to this company for 30 years. I was 
expecting a member of top management to come down from 
his ivory tower to face us with the layoff announcement, 
rather than sending the kitchen supervisor with guards 
to escort us off the premises. You will pay for your 
senseless behavior." The man later confessed to 
sabotaging his former employer's computer system - at a 
cost of $20 million.

*** Thom Hickling, part-time writer, full-time minstrel 
and friend, sends word from Baltimore that times are 
truly getting tough. Thom's 94 Plymouth Horizon - 
lovingly referred as the "thundernugget" - was stolen 
from out in front of one of the Agora buildings.

"Crackheads," said the police.

"What would a crackhead want with that ol' thing?" asked 
Thom. He suspects someone holding shares of JDS 

* * * * * * * * Advertisement * * * * * * * * * * *


It's a shame people repeat the same financial mistakes 
of the past. And yet, if you just paid attention to some 
of the experiences of others, you could not only avoid 
some very serious mistakes... but maybe even come out 
way ahead.

Did you know that no banks or brokerage houses went bust 
in the 1929 crash? In fact, many investors and 
businessmen prospered. The real damage was done later on 
- when popular sentiment turned against stocks 
altogether. Just as is happening in our markets today... 

Will you profit in the months ahead? 

You will if you prepare yourself now! Understand the 
psychology of market "manias" and the mechanics of the 
great "bubbles" of history. Grasp the wisdom: EVERYTHING 
that is happening in the markets today has already 
happened before. 

Click below to learn more...
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

The Daily Reckoning Presents: A Special Guest Essay. 
Having returned from a 3-week stay in Turkey, on the 
heels of a 10-day sojourn to Malaysia, Doug Casey offers 
some thoughts on America - in the eyes of the world.

By Doug Casey

Domestically, I'd say the biggest problem we face is the 
continual and accelerating loss of freedom - compounded 
by the prospect of what I suspect could be the biggest 
financial/economic crisis of modern times. 

What sort of crisis will it be? 

That's unpredictable, although the odds are it will be 
unlike others that are still fresh in people's memories, 
simply because people tend to be most prepared for the 
things that have most recently scared them. The big 
problems usually come from expected quarters at 
unexpected the monetary crisis of 1998 that 
materialized in Thailand.

That said, the question remains of where to look. My 
guess is that the crisis will come from outside American the form of war. 

Some might protest that a discussion of [war] has no 
place in an investment letter, but I hold it's just as 
relevant as discussions of politics, science, 
technology, history, or any other area of human 
endeavor. Investments cannot exist in a vacuum.

Not considering such basics is a fundamental error. 

And what happens to your investments is certainly 
subject to the prospect for war. I know the conventional 
wisdom - after Fukuyama's End of History, and naive,
albeit interesting, observations like those in The
Lexus and the Olive Tree that no countries with
McDonald's franchises have yet taken up arms - is that 
there won't be any more serious wars. 

But I don't buy it.

War is perhaps the worst thing that can happen, not
only for the destruction it will cause in itself, but 
because it will immensely exacerbate America's domestic 

To quote the famous words of Stirner, "War is the health
of the State."

But neither a declared war, nor war in the conventional
sense, is likely in the cards. US troops have been in
combat in a dozen countries since our last "official"
war ended in 1945; the US troops stationed in over 100
countries are an accident waiting to happen. Besides 
the Balkans and Iraq, Colombia is probably highest
on the dance card, but almost anyplace could erupt

Who, after all, could have predicted that the US would 
invade Somalia in 1991, a country few people besides 
stamp collectors even knew existed? No place is safe 
from attack in The National Interest of the world's
self-appointed policeman.

Anything is possible within this context, but I discount 
the likelihood of another Vietnam, again because of the 
"recent collective memory" phenomenon. Vietnam is
perhaps the major reason why the Iraq attack ended so 
quickly; a speedy withdrawal obviated any danger that 
ground troops might get stuck in a major tar baby. But
when you're sticking your nose absolutely everywhere it 
doesn't belong, there are lots of ways to get it

My guess is that something resembling a Crusade is 
developing against those who live in the Koran Belt. It 
won't be overtly religious like the crusades of the 
Middle Ages, but it will have major cultural undertones.

And there's every prospect it will be highly 
unconventional in nature.

This is why all the talk about a strategic missile 
defense system (ABM) for the US is so totally 

Why would an enemy of the US spend a fortune building 
ICBMs - a clunky, inaccurate, 1950s era technology - 
when a plethora of ABC (atomic, biological, chemical) 
weapons can be sent by Fed Ex? They'll arrive exactly 
where you want them, and precisely on time.

You may think I'm joking, but the most effective 
delivery system is one that's cheap, reliable, 
unexpected, redundant, untraceable and hard to detect 
until it's too late. If you have an especially large 
device to deliver, it can be shipped as cargo in a 
conventional boat or plane. Indeed, just as a car 
bomb is great for taking out a building, an equally 
innocuous boat or plane can take out an entire city.

When the attack comes on the US, that's the form it will 
take. Ballistic missiles may have some terror/propaganda 
value for countries like North Korea or Iraq, for use 
against regional enemies. But these people aren't 
stupid; they know that if they launched a strike on the 
US with a missile, there'd be no question about its 
source. And no question about the response. 

No government or group would dream of attacking the US 
in that manner, since it would literally amount to 
signing their own national death warrant. It's simply 
not going to happen that way. If they want to take out 
some US cities, it won't be with a missile.

Why, then, does the US government want to spend scores 
of billions on a missile defense system that's worth 
less than a Maginot Line? In fact, they should nickname 
the ABM - in the manner that's long been the case for US 
weapons - the "Maginot." 

Are they really that stupid? Or is the money flowing to 
defense contractors really that important? Or is it a PR 
stunt to convince Boobus Americanus that he's safe? Or 
all of the above? I don't know. 

But to me, it's absolute proof that the generals and 
their masters are just as intent on fighting the last 
war as has been the case every time in the past.

This isn't unexpected. The US has - depending on who's 
doing the accounting, and how many are built - spent $2 
billion on each B-2 "Sitting Duck" bomber, and will 
spend $250 million on each F-22 "White Elephant" 
fighter, an aircraft superbly suited to fighting a non-
existent hi-tech enemy.

Even if building these hi-tech showboats was a good 
idea, I question whether these devices aren't
overpriced by an order of magnitude. You'll recall that
the P-51, the best fighter of WWII, went from the
drawing board to production in seven months, and was 
cranked out at $50,000 a copy. OK, say that's $500,000
in today's money, and the F-22 is vastly more complex
and capable. But the real prices of raw materials has 
plummeted, and the advances in technology have done the 
same for both design and manufacturing costs. 

If nothing else, it's a testimony to the inefficiency 
and corruption inherent to the procurement system.

Entirely apart from that, any (serious) potential enemy 
will make sure they're taken out on the ground with 
saboteurs, special operations units, or ABC weapons. 
When you're dealing with aircraft that cost a few 
million, and you've got thousands of them widely 
dispersed, these things are manageable. But when you've 
got very limited numbers you can buy at hundreds of 
millions a copy, it's a different story. The US will 
hardly dare deploy these weapons because the loss of 
only one in combat would be a catastrophe.

But these are strictly tangential points. Weapons like 
these are as useless as the ABM against what's coming in 
the next war.

It's a truism that the best defense is good offense. 
But it's only true once you're in an active war, and are 
trying to win it. Regrettably, the US is confusing good 
offense with running around the world giving offense, 
and it will only result in starting a war.

The only defense against the kind of attack that will 
open the next conflict is, frankly, to give the attacker 
no reason to attack. Does Argentina, or Canada, or 
Italy, or Thailand or, really, any country in the world 
besides the US, have reason to fear a massive ABC 
attack? The answer is no. Sure, the Indians and the 
Pakistanis, the Chinese and the Taiwanese, the North and 
South Koreans could attack each other. But the source of 
the threat is discrete. 

Only the US is running around the world, whacking a 
hundred different hornets' nests. A major power could 
get away with this in the past. The most the natives 
could do in retaliation was assassinate the odd 
dignitary, or ambush the odd patrol. But the world has 
changed. Now, if you antagonize a group badly enough, 
they're entirely capable of bringing the war to your 
home ground. The World Trade Center bombing, which 
should have, by all rights, been a success, and the USS 
Cole bombing, which was a stunning success, are only the 
most trivial examples of what's in store.

Almost anyone can build a nuclear device today. Various 
designs are published, and the methods of enriching 
uranium are not complex. It's not rocket science any 
longer. Moreover, why bother, when a million dollars 
passed to a Russian general (or maybe just a sergeant, 
since he actually handles the things) can buy you state-
of-the-art equipment? 

That's even more true of biological and chemical 

The question isn't whether it will be used. That's a 
certainty. Anything that can be imagined can probably be 
done; and anything that can be done, probably will be 
done. It's simply a question of when. And by whom. 

Yours truly,

Doug Casey, 
for The Daily Reckoning

International Speculator Doug Casey has been seeking and 
finding investment opportunities around the world for 25 
years. For more information on how you can take 
advantage of profitable opportunities unearthed by Casey 
in his speculative travels, please see his report: 

Nobody Notices the Good News... Until It's Too Late. 
About The Daily Reckoning:

Daily Reckoning author Bill Bonner

Bill Bonner is, in spite of himself, a natural born contrarian. Early each morning, Bill writes The Daily Reckoning—his take on the financial markets and what’s going on in the world—and sends it off by e-mail before most Americans’ alarm clocks have buzzed. Many readers say it's the first thing they want to read when they get up—not only because it's informative and thought provoking, but also it's inspiring, in its own quirky and provocative way.

Of course, there's much more to Bill than his daily market commentary. He's also the founder and president of Agora Publishing, one of the world's most successful consumer newsletter publishing companies. Bill's passion for international travel and big ideas are reflected in the company he's successfully built. In 1979, he began publishing International Living and Hulbert's Financial Digest . Since then, the company has grown to include dozens of newsletters focusing on health, travel, and finance. Bill has vigorously expanded from Agora's home base in Baltimore, Maryland since the early ’90s—opening offices in Florida, London, Paris, Ireland, and Germany.

Agora's publication subsidiaries include Pickering & Chatto, a prestigious academic press in London and Les Belles Lettres in Paris, best known as a publisher of classical literature in bilingual editions.


Search for it at the TulipSearch Open Directory
Investment Bookstore Investment Newsstand Market Mavens Report



Tulips and Bears
Internet Stock Talk
Traders Message Boards
Traders Press Bookstore

City Guides
Travel Center
Bargain Bloodhound

TulipHost...coming soon
TulipTools...coming soon
...coming soon

Questions or Comments? Contact Us

Copyright ´┐Ż 1998-2002 Tulips and Bears LLC.
All Rights Reserved.  Republication of this material,
including posting to message boards or news groups,
without the prior written consent of Tulips and Bears LLC
is strictly prohibited.  'Tulips and Bears' is a registered trademark of Tulips and Bears LLC

Last modified: August 02, 2001

Published By Tulips and Bears LLC