"I started with only $10,000, and it has gone on to make as
much as $5 million - in a single year. This gave me a taste
for the wealth that venture capital investing could
generate."
- Jim Davidson, Strategic Opportunities
That same $10,000 invested at 9% would only be worth
$114,000. But because the company started with that
"seed money" has prospered - it's now worth many millions.
Last year's profit alone was more than 50 times $114,000.
You simply can't make that kind of money by pinching
pennies. For more on...
*** The Fed Funds Rate Theory of Stock Market Timing says
that when the Fed is cutting rates, stocks will rise. When
the Fed is raising rates, on the other hand, stocks will
fall. "Don't fight the Fed," chime the pros.
*** It is a simple theory, alas fatally flawed by the
feedback mechanism of all natural systems, or what George
Soros calls 'reflexivity'.
*** When stocks are rising and the economy is roaring...
investors can look ahead to the moment when the Fed decides
that inflation, or irrational exuberance, or the wealth
effect threaten the stability of the markets. The higher
stock prices are bid up, the more likely the Fed is to
switch to a tightening bias and deflate the bubble.
*** Now, the opposite feedback menaces investors - the more
enthusiastically they respond to the 'Rate Cut' relief
rally, the less likely it is that the Fed will cut rates.
*** Ray Devoe: "Later today commentators on CNBC and the
media will be dissecting Mr. Greenspan's testimony to get
some indication of what he really meant. I don't see why
they bother, since he really means to say nothing at all."
*** "Greenspan has become a cult icon, idolized by
stockholders for providing the background for their
financial rewards," Devoe continues. "Two recent very
flattering books about the Fed Chairman make him appear a
Pope-like figure...infallible. But it would serve you well
to keep in mind, Mr. Greenspan gets only the same
information everyone else gets - just a day or so earlier.
He is human, not infallible, and can make mistakes." (see:
"Nostradamus" - The "Greenspan" Of His Time
http://www.dailyreckoning.com/body_headline.cfm?id=959)
*** "If for some reason Greenspan actually does cut rates,"
writes Bill Fleckenstein, "which I don't expect - that may
hold the market up a little bit longer... In any case, it's
very possible that we could see a dramatic acceleration
from here, where all the indexes get in gear to the
downside. That's something I still expect at some point, in
part because the S&P and the Dow are still ridiculously
overvalued."
*** After the Dow shot up 200 points on Monday, investors
seemed to lose faith. The Dow closed down 5 points
yesterday. The Nasdaq suffered more damage - closing down
100 points, under 2,000 for the first time since May '99.
*** The big losers of the day were the big techs and
Internets. Cisco, for example, fell below $25 - down $2 for
the day. JDS Uniphase said it was laying off 10% of its
staff; the stock fell 15%. Gateway lost 6% after Merrill
downgraded the stock to 'neutral'.
*** Goldman Sachs, too, offered investors helpful
advice...changing its rating of Agency.com from 'market
outperformer' to 'market performer'. The stock continued to
sink, losing another 25 cents yesterday to close at $2.19.
It was $30 last spring.
*** eToys went all the way down - it filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection. Expect a new rating from Merrill or
Goldman any day. How about 'market vanish'?
*** Despite the losses, these Big Techs are still
overpriced. Juniper sells at a price equal to 67 times
earnings. Cisco is at 41 times earnings.
*** Analysts also revised downward their targets for the
major indexes. Jeff Galvin of Credit Suisse First Boston
had a target of 4,000 for the Nasdaq by year-end. He now
thinks that 3,000 would be more likely. Lehman Bros.
strategist Jeff Applegate lowered his target for the Dow
too - from 13,000 to 12,500. "The future's not ours to
see," Doris Day once warbled. But 1500 is probably a better
guess for where the Nasdaq will end the year. The Dow,
meanwhile, is more likely to be around 8,000 than 12,000.
*** Analysts, as I've pointed out many times, don't have a
clue. Last year about this time, analysts' projected
earnings growth for the Big Techs in the first quarter of
2001. They came up with an average growth figure of 28%.
Then, over the year, the forecast was revised downward to
14%...then to 4%...and is now -19%. Mr. And Ms. Analyst
change their minds...but only after Mr. Market changes his.
*** Philip Morris lit up yesterday; the stock rose 3.8% to
$8.26.
*** Nike just did it - dropping nearly 20% in price.
*** Internets fell offline... down 7%.
*** The big winners yesterday were - would you believe it?
- gold mining companies. Gold rose $1.60 as the dollar slid
back. Lease rates have doubled in the last two days - to
4.12% for one-month contracts. The CBOE gold index rose 7%
yesterday. Is another short squeeze developing? More
below...
*** The Conference Board reported that consumer confidence
slipped again in February...the 5th month in a row. It is at
its lowest level since June of '96.
*** Lynn Carpenter: "To think I've been complaining about
U.S. beef. It isn't as robust and tasty as it used to be-
thanks to the low-fat ninnies who gave marbling - and taste
- a bad name, but at least it's still beef..." Lynn reports
that in response to the mad cow scare here in Europe,
Canada is now exporting 160 tons of viande de cheval (horse
meat) every week to France and Germany - a historic high.
*** "Hoorah, for the Dayaks!" several Daily Reckoning
readers e-mailed in response to yesterday's missive. "They
are fighting an oppressive government," wrote another on
the discussion board "...and fighting the oppression of a
civilization that tries to make us all think and act
exactly the same. As a US citizen, I root for the
underdogs." What being from the US has to do with rooting
for underdogs, I don't know. Still the Dayaks appear to have
garnered support for their campaign of violence - thousands
of miles away. (see: Love Them Dayaks http://www.agora-
inc.com/forums/index.cfm?cfapp=3)
*** "Are you English?" asked Jacqueline, my new French
tutor last night. "I've had clients from all over the
world," said the red-haired woman of about 65. "I like them
all, except maybe the English."
*** No matter where you go, people manage to find some
group not to like. The French blame the English for the Mad
Cow disease...and just about everything else. "The English
think themselves so superior," she elaborated without
invitation. "Are you sure you're not English," she asked
again, suspiciously, "you have an English accent, not an
American one."
*** Of course, the English return the French sentiments,
with interest. "The wogs start at Calais," an English
friend puts it.
Knowing which coins to buy and sell - and what price to pay
- is critical to your success. For the best prices on NGC
and PCGS certified coins...and access to the one of the
nation's leading coin market newsletters, click here: (or
call 1-800-224-3160)
Leading Coin Market Newsletters
(http://www.goldrarities.com/cgi-bin/ldisplay.cgi?coins2)
*** Note: On January 9, 2001, we recommended to Daily
Reckoning subscribers the $2-1/2 Indian MS-63 condition at
$485 each. These coins are now selling for $585 each - a
gain of over 20%. For current and accurate market
information, click the link above.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
This headline from the February 12th Barron's might some day
enter into the pantheon of Great Contrarian Buy Signals.
So far, the movement in the price of gold has been
positive, but not spectacular. Gold rose from $261 to $268.
It rose $1.60 yesterday. Since roughly February 12th,
the XAU mining index has risen from 46 to over 54.
Like its major competitors - the dollar, the euro and
yen...the value of gold rests on nothing more than the
'group feel' of the market place. In their collective
sentiments, people could decide that an ounce of gold
is equivalent to two suits of clothes - or only to a
handkerchief. Over many generations, however, gold's
purchasing power has averaged somewhere in between -
usually at about the price of a single suit. Julius Caesar
could have exchanged an ounce of gold for a smart toga and
belt. So might I today, provided I didn't mind looking like
a man in a cheap suit. (I asked my colleague, Addison, to
verify this. He reports that you can get a suit at Marks
and Spencer's around the corner for just $277 - almost
exactly the price of an ounce of gold.)
A good suit, though, would cost at least 2 ounces of gold.
Over time, the supply of gold increases - but so does the
number of people in the world, and does the supply of
suits. (Gold seems as though it were provided by nature
herself...for use as stable money.)
Yet, since WWII, gold has been pushed out of its monetary
role. It is regarded as an impediment to central bankers,
who - it is argued - need to be free to destroy their
national currencies at whatever rate conditions warrant.
And, over the last two decades, gold has gradually been
dropped by private owners as well as public ones.
But sooner or later the 'group feel' that created a 20-year
bear market in gold will bottom out. At least, that is the
working hypothesis of today's letter.
The Barron's article, of Feb. 12th, illustrated the despair
into which gold investors have sunk. "It's difficult to
find any positive news in the depressed gold market," wrote
Cheryl Strauss Einhorn. "At around $260 an ounce, the metal
continues to trade near its cost of production and almost
no one believes it will rally soon."
"We are an industry incapable of realizing good returns for
our shareholders," the article quoted Ferdi Dippenaar, of
Harmony Gold, the world's 6th largest producer. And
"unfortunately," he continued, "there is nothing positive
on the horizon."
"Brokerage houses seem to agree," adds Ms. Einhorn, "In
another sign of the times, ABN Amro gold analyst Todd
Hinrichs threw in the towel and stopped covering the
industry a few week ago."
"I've capitulated and moved on. The gold industry is
essentially a very difficult place to make a dollar. There
is nothing positive. It's as bad as it gets."
Mr. Hinrichs decided to switch to covering manufacturing -
an industry with room to get worse.
That was only a little more than two weeks ago. Since then,
the price of gold has risen $8. And gold stocks have done
well. Newmont has gone from around $14 to near $17.
Homestake has gained a dollar. And Anglo-gold, which I
believe I suggested to you several weeks ago, has risen
nearly $4.
What might drive gold higher? The competition, perhaps?
"How anybody would want to own the dollar here is beyond
me," wrote Lance "Crash" Lewis in his commentary on the
Prudent Bear yesterday. The Fed is cutting rates. Inflation
is increasing. Recession is a real risk - and no one knows
how severe it might be. The negative trade balance and
private debt have reached frightening levels. The current
account has not been so deeply in the red, compared to GDP,
since 1816. And private debt now equals 6% of the GDP, a
level we have never seen before.
The price of gold, and the price of the dollar, are both
set by the 'group feel' of the market. The sentiments that
have lifted up one money and cast down the other are, of
course, subject to change. A man who prefers 300 dead
presidents today might prefer an ounce of gold tomorrow;
stranger things have happened.
But in this respect, the dollar and gold are not the same.
The feedback mechanisms do not work the same way. As the
price of gold falls, investment in mining declines. People
who might have dug more gold from the ground go out of
business. Or they may change the nature of their business.
Mark Twain described a mining company as a "hole in the
ground with a liar in front of it." In the recent dot.com
bubble, several erstwhile mining companies simply dispensed
with the hole.
The result: supplies fall. The precious metal becomes less
ubiquitous and more precious.
But what happens to the dollar when 'group feel' turns
against it? It falls...but where? Recession and falling
stock prices will almost certainly be accompanied by a
falling dollar. The Fed's reaction will be - and already is
- to increase the supply of dollars! Just as there is no
limit on how many 'dollars' the Fed can create...nor is
there a limit on how worthless each of them may become.
The mob of investors, especially foreign investors, heading
for the exits, as they suddenly realize their dollars are
losing value... may be as hard to stop as a gang of
drunken skinheads. If a dollar is not worth a dollar, is it
worth 90 cents? Or 50 cents? Or 25 cents. Or nothing at
all?
The Gold Standard...like the Golden Rule...establishes a
limit. During the Depression, many economists argue, it
made recovery difficult because it was so inflexible.
During the next depression, the world may have the opposite
problem - a money supply that is too elastic.
Daily Reckoning readers with long memories may recall a
headline of mine from almost exactly a year ago: "Gold to
Rise," I wrote confidently. The gold price then was over
$300...a level from which it declined and has not seen
since. So, with that admission, I leave it to you to decide
how accurate today's forecast may be:
Faced with a 'money' of no certain value...which can be
made even less valuable by its Fed managers...people are
likely to turn to the competition.
Gold to rise...sooner or later.
Bill Bonner, American...not English
About
The Daily Reckoning:
Daily Reckoning
author Bill Bonner
Bill Bonner is,
in spite of himself, a natural born contrarian. Early each morning, Bill
writes The Daily
Reckoninghis take on the financial markets and whats going
on in the worldand sends it off by e-mail before most Americans
alarm clocks have buzzed. Many readers say it's the first thing they want
to read when they get upnot only because it's informative and thought
provoking, but also it's inspiring, in its own quirky and provocative way.
Of course, there's
much more to Bill than his daily market commentary. He's also the founder
and president of Agora Publishing, one of the world's most successful
consumer newsletter publishing companies. Bill's passion for international
travel and big ideas are reflected in the company he's successfully built.
In 1979, he began publishing International Living and Hulbert's
Financial Digest . Since then, the company has grown to include
dozens of newsletters focusing on health, travel, and finance. Bill has
vigorously expanded from Agora's home base in Baltimore, Maryland since
the early 90sopening offices in Florida, London, Paris, Ireland, and
Germany.
Agora's publication
subsidiaries include Pickering
& Chatto, a prestigious academic press in London and Les
Belles Lettres in Paris, best known as a publisher of classical
literature in bilingual editions.
Copyright � 1998-2002 Tulips and Bears LLC.
All Rights Reserved. Republication of this material,
including posting to message boards or news groups,
without the prior written consent of Tulips and Bears LLC
is strictly prohibited. 'Tulips and Bears' is a registered trademark of
Tulips and Bears LLC
Last modified: April 01, 2001
Published By Tulips and Bears
LLC